Wouldn't it be great if there was a study that compared patient outcomes among several groups based on a single, common diagnosis but several potential medication regimens? How might such a study be designed?
Perhaps you could identify 300 patients, all of whom presented in the emergency department of a hospital with acute low back pain. We might assess their level of disability utilizing a widely used health status measure like, say, the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ). We might divide the patients into three groups based on their medication regimen:
1. Naproxen + placebo
2. Naproxen + cyclobenzaprine
3. Naproxen + oxycodone/acetaminophen
We'd make sure the initial RMDQ scores were roughly similar across all three groups. We'd also make sure all three groups were similar demographically and that each patient received education on management of low back pain prior to discharge from the hospital. Then we'd call the patients at the 1 week mark and the 3 month mark to re-assess their level of disability. That would tell us which of the three various medication regimens provides for the best patient outcomes.
Such a study would be helpful, right?
Well, researchers at Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine conducted just such a study and the results are compelling.
It appears that "take two Aleve and get some rest" may, in fact, be the best (and certainly the safest) course of action when it comes to preventing acute LBP from becoming chronic LBP.
Michael
On Twitter @PRIUM1
Michael Gavin, President of PRIUM, focuses on healthcare issues facing risk managers in the workers' compensation space and beyond. He places particular emphasis on the over-utilization of prescription drugs in the treatment of injured workers.
Showing posts with label clinical study. Show all posts
Showing posts with label clinical study. Show all posts
Tuesday, October 27, 2015
Monday, October 27, 2014
NNT in Pain Management: You've Been Right All Along
The National Safety Council's Dr. Don Teater, MD has penned a white paper that contains powerful data and interesting insights regarding the use of opioids for chronic non-cancer pain. And it turns out, you've been right all along...
First, a pause for acronym education. Just when you were getting a handle on MEDs... let me introduce you to NNT (number needed to treat). This is a common measure in clinical studies that answers the question: how many people need to be treated with a given intervention for 1 person to receive a defined effect. A lower NNT means the intervention is more effective (1 is the ideal... if you treat 1 person and that person achieves the defined effect, an NNT = 1 means you've got a really effective treatment). A higher NNT means the intervention is less effective.
For instance, how many people need to be treated with Oxycodone 15 mg for 1 person to receive 50% pain relief? Turns out the answer to that question is 4.6.
How many people need to be treated with a combination of ibuprofen 200 mg + acetaminophen 500 mg for 1 person to receive 50% pain relief? Drum roll, please........ 1.6.
He also shares similar data from couple of other studies.
Why do providers turn to opioids so frequently in light of data such as this? Why does this inherent belief exist that suggests opioids are more powerful analgesics? Dr. Teater sites several reasons, but the two that caught my eye:
Bottom line: You've been right all along. For most patients, ibuprofen and acetaminophen are safer and more effective than opioids.
Michael
On Twitter @PRIUM1
First, a pause for acronym education. Just when you were getting a handle on MEDs... let me introduce you to NNT (number needed to treat). This is a common measure in clinical studies that answers the question: how many people need to be treated with a given intervention for 1 person to receive a defined effect. A lower NNT means the intervention is more effective (1 is the ideal... if you treat 1 person and that person achieves the defined effect, an NNT = 1 means you've got a really effective treatment). A higher NNT means the intervention is less effective.
For instance, how many people need to be treated with Oxycodone 15 mg for 1 person to receive 50% pain relief? Turns out the answer to that question is 4.6.
How many people need to be treated with a combination of ibuprofen 200 mg + acetaminophen 500 mg for 1 person to receive 50% pain relief? Drum roll, please........ 1.6.
Why do providers turn to opioids so frequently in light of data such as this? Why does this inherent belief exist that suggests opioids are more powerful analgesics? Dr. Teater sites several reasons, but the two that caught my eye:
- Opioids exhibit powerful psychotherapeutic effects not found with ibuprofen and acetaminophen. If a patient's back hurts, tylenol and advil will work fine. If a patient's back hurts and they're depressed, opioids are more likely to be perceived by the patient as effective. This sounds obvious to most of us, but separating the clinical effects of opioids into "analgesic" vs. "psychotherapeutic" has significant implications for the use of these medications.
- The pharma companies have spent several billion dollars over two decades getting doctors comfortable with opioids. Where there's money to be made... there's usually a rep standing by to help a doctor make a decision that may not be fully informed.
Bottom line: You've been right all along. For most patients, ibuprofen and acetaminophen are safer and more effective than opioids.
Michael
On Twitter @PRIUM1
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)