- A hard cap of 90 MED based on the CDC guidelines for no more than one month when the Work Comp MSA includes a surgical projection; and/or,
- A hard cap of 40 MED for no more than one month, followed by a 10% per week mandatory tapering and weaning plan, as recommended by the CDC, until fully weaned from opioids
I find this attempt at hoisting the federal government with its own petard laudable. When the federal government's public health agency says one thing, but that same government's healthcare payment policy agency says another, they ought to be called to account for it. Just about anyone who reads this blog with any regularity is familiar with the crushing clinical and financial burden of opioids in general, but also specifically in regard to MSAs. Long term use of expensive and potentially addictive medication is driving huge pharmacy allocations and prohibiting settlements. So good for NAMSAP for putting this issue front and center with more than just a tired complaint, but rather with a specific call to action. Good stuff.
Only one small problem. I don't think it has a chance at being implemented.
There are plenty of smart people in our industry that have forgotten more about MSAs than I will ever know. But if I were writing the CMS response to NAMSAP, I would probably write: “We recognize that some of the treatment for which we demand allocation is outside of evidence based guidelines. We support any and all efforts to bring care for these injured workers within those guidelines. However, we respect the sanctity of the doctor-patient relationship and should a projection include long term use of opioids above the evidence based threshold, CMS will still demand an appropriate allocation for those medications.”
I think the NAMSAP idea is fantastic - it should start a necessary dialogue around conflicting federal government policies and the clinical and financial risks it creates for patients and payers. But I believe it has little hope of changing CMS policy, at least in the short term. Hasn't CMS historically deferred to the treating physician’s approach, even when it makes no sense?
One might argue that this is different, people are dying of opioid overdoses and the Medicare eligible population is not immune from that phenomenon.
I hope I'm wrong.
Follw me on Twitter @PRIUM1