To paraphrase Twain, though, reports of the death of the state-based work comp system have been greatly exaggerated.
Nevertheless, those who dismiss this report based solely on its well-deserved criticism are clearly missing the broader picture. There is a fundamental problem in this country with disability management and the public safety net that supports it. And when the public safety net is perceived as inadequate, the most politically expedient solutions are to neither generate revenue (i.e., raise taxes) nor to reduce expenses (i.e., cut benefits); rather, the first solution is to look for an exogenous entity to blame and from which, if luck prevails, to extract rent. In this case, the federal government has found at least one scapegoat: workers' compensation.
And not without cause, mind you. The relationship between work comp and Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) is ill-defined, but we know from an analysis of past and present "off-set payments" (wherein an individual receives payment from both work comp and SSDI) that of those currently receiving SSDI, a little over 12% of them have also received work comp payments. While those payments are material (on the order of perhaps $10 billion of the total SSDI spend of $145 billion), this analysis fails to address the larger issue: how many SSDI recipients could have filed a work comp claim, but never did? That's a much bigger number.
One alarming, but nonetheless informative, statistic regarding the SSDI population showed up in the May 2016 edition of Health Affairs. If you've heard me speak on a blogger panel this summer or fall, you've heard me talk about this. The graph below shows spending on opioids by the Medicare and Medicaid programs between 1999 and 2012. The purple line should jump out at you... it represents opioid spending for the Medicare population that is under 65 years of age.
This is effectively the SSDI population (disabled people under 65 receive indemnity payments from SSDI and healthcare coverage from Medicare) and we're spending more than $1 billion of tax dollars per year on their opioids. This group is about one-fifth the size of the over 65 cohort, yet we're spending more on opioids for them. On a per person basis, opioid spend for those over 65 is $192 per year. For the 45-65 cohort covered by Medicare (an approximation for SSDI), it's $683 per year... or nearly 4X more. Interestingly, the opioid spend covered by private insurers for those aged 45-64 is $274/year and for Medicaid it's $251/year.
So what the heck is wrong with the Medicare group aged 45-64? They're disabled, that's what's wrong. And there's the rub. If you think it's difficult to track, measure, manage, and mitigate opioid use in work comp, it's comparably impossible today within the SSDI population.
A broken disability safety net is a dangerous political phenomenon - one we should take seriously and treat with the respect it deserves.
On Twitter @PRIUM1