I'm sitting in New Orleans, Louisiana at the annual RIMS conference and right down the road in Baton Rouge, the state is about to do something that will put a lot of injured workers at risk. Ironic, right?
Louisiana Senate Bill 256 is scheduled for a hearing at 10 am central tomorrow. I hope someone at that hearing points out the following:
1) Evidence based medicine isn't produced by a panel. The bill calls for a panel (made up of one doctor and four pharmacists) to meet regularly and, by majority vote, decide what changes should be made to the formulary. This is an awful idea. Evidence based medicine is developed through peer reviewed research and should be adopted as the evidence dictates, not according to a majority vote. For a brief glimpse into how guidelines adoption by committee works (or, rather, doesn't work) in Lousiana, check this out.
2) But should the state insist on a committee, we need to move beyond a single doc and four pharmacists. Where is the voice of the employer on this proposed panel? Where is the voice of the injured worker? Wh y does a single doc and four pharmacists get to decide?
3) Worst of all... and the point that will lead to the greatest risk to injured workers... and the part of the bill that shows how very little its authors know about medical management: All "non-narcotic drugs" will be approved and not require pre-authorization. Since when are narcotics the only dangerous drugs in work comp? Hydrocodone might require authorization under this bill, but injured workers can have all the benzodiazepines, antidepressants, antipsychotics, anticonvulsants, sleep aids, muscle relaxants, etc that they'd like. The distinction between drugs that require authorization vs those that do not shouldn't be based on the drug's class. Rather, good formularies assess the appropriateness of a given medication for first line therapy, regardless of class. The approach outlined in SB 256 is worse than silly; it's dangerous.
A closed formulary is a great idea in concept and I genuinely hope to see Louisiana adopt one.
Just not this one.
Follow us on Twitter @PRIUM1
Post a Comment